Radar measures motion along the beam and nothing else. Everything confusing about the velocity display follows from that one sentence.

In this lesson you will

  • Explain the radial-velocity-only restriction and the color convention.
  • Distinguish base from storm-relative velocity.
  • Identify a velocity couplet and explain what rotational velocity is.
  • Identify aliasing, range folding and the zero isodop.

One component only

This is the whole lesson and everything else is consequence. The radar can only measure the part of a target's motion that is along the beam, toward it or away from it. Motion across the beam is completely invisible to it.

Two panels. The left shows a radar at the bottom left with three identical wind arrows at the same speed but different directions relative to the beam: one straight along the beam showing full measured speed, one at an angle showing a reduced measured component, and one across the beam showing zero measured speed despite the wind being just as strong. The right panel shows a rotating circulation viewed from the radar with inbound green velocities on one side and outbound red on the other, immediately adjacent, with the peak inbound and outbound values labeled and the rotational velocity given as their average.
Left: the same wind speed reads as full, partial or zero depending only on its angle to the beam. Right: rotation shows as strong inbound directly beside strong outbound, which is the only way a radial-only instrument can see a spin. WxAlerts
The convention, and the mistake it causes
Green is toward the radar. Red is away from it. Nothing else. Red does not mean strong, dangerous, or outbound-tornado. A 70 knot wind blowing directly across the beam displays as zero, in whatever color zero is, while a gentle breeze straight down the beam displays as a real number. The colors are about geometry, not severity.

Base against storm-relative

Base velocity
What the radar measured: the ground-relative motion along the beam. Includes the storm bodily moving along, which on a fast-moving storm can dominate everything else.
Storm-relative velocity
The same field with the storm motion subtracted out. What is left is the circulation within the storm, which is what you actually want to look at. A rotation that is hidden in base velocity because the whole storm is racing along can be obvious in storm-relative.
And the caveat on storm-relative
It is only as good as the storm motion that was subtracted. If the assumed motion is wrong, the storm-relative field is wrong, and it can invent an apparent circulation or hide a real one. Forecasters know this and adjust it. An app that picks the motion for you may not have picked well.

Couplets

A rotating column, seen from the side by an instrument that can only measure along-beam motion, shows as strong inbound velocity immediately beside strong outbound velocity. That adjacency is the signature. Wide separation between the extremes is a broad circulation or none at all; tight adjacency between two adjacent radar samples is the thing forecasters call gate-to-gate shear.

Rotational velocity is the standard way to put a number on it: the average of the inbound and outbound peaks. If the strongest inbound is 50 knots and the strongest outbound is 40, the rotational velocity is 45 knots.

What is knownWhat follows
Probability of tornado damage rises as low-level rotational velocity risesWell established in the literature, and it is a probability rather than a threshold
About 45 knots at the lowest tilt is used as an impact-based warning tag thresholdThe one specific number worth knowing, and it is a warning-issuance figure rather than a spotter figure
Values inflate or wash out with rangeBeam broadening averages a tight circulation away. The same tornado gives a much smaller number at 100 km than at 30

This course deliberately publishes no table converting rotational velocity to a damage rating. Those tables exist, they bin differently between studies, and nothing module 7 asks of a spotter requires estimating a damage rating from a radar app.

The error this whole module is built to prevent
A couplet is rotation aloft. It is not a tornado on the ground. Lesson 2 told you how high the beam is at range; the couplet you are looking at may be a mile up. Many couplets never produce a tornado. Some tornadoes occur under unimpressive couplets. You cannot see the ground on this product, and lesson 9 is about what that means for what you say.

Three artifacts that fool people

Velocity aliasing
The radar can only measure speeds unambiguously up to a limit. Above it, the value wraps around and displays as a strong velocity of the opposite sign. The giveaway is an abrupt transition from extreme inbound to extreme outbound with no sensible values between, often in a patch rather than a tight couplet. Software usually corrects it and sometimes fails.
Range folding
Returns from beyond the unambiguous range assigned to the wrong distance, displayed as blocks of missing data, purple on many color scales. Purple is absence of data, not severity. It is one of the more consequential misreadings in amateur use.
The zero isodop
The line through the display where the wind is blowing across the beam and the measured velocity is therefore zero. Its shape encodes how the wind turns with height, which is a forecaster skill. For a spotter it is worth recognizing so it is not mistaken for a boundary or a feature in the storm.

Check yourself

A velocity display shows a tight pair of strong green and strong red pixels immediately adjacent, 90 km from the radar. What can you report?

  1. Nothing from this alone. It is rotation aloft; go and look, and report what you can see
  2. A tornado, since gate-to-gate shear is the definitive tornado signature
  3. A tornado moving away from the radar, since the red side indicates outbound motion
  4. Strong straight-line winds, since the colors show air moving in opposite directions
Hint

Work out roughly how high the beam is at 90 km, using module 1 lesson 1.

Answer

Nothing from this alone. It is rotation aloft; go and look, and report what you can see

At 90 km the lowest beam is around 4,000 feet up, so a couplet there is a circulation most of a mile above the ground. It is a good reason to pay attention and it is not an observation of anything at the surface. The third option misreads the color convention, which is about direction relative to the radar and nothing else.

Sources

  1. Thompson et al. 2017, Wea. Forecasting 32(4), 1509–1528: tornado damage rating probabilities derived from WSR-88D data
  2. NOAA JetStream, the online school for weather: radar
  3. NWS Warning Decision Training Division, radar and warning guidance
  4. Smith et al. 2015, Wea. Forecasting: WSR-88D tornado intensity estimates and conditional probability of damage rating